WARNING TO DELAY IN DIAGNOSING MICROSCOPIC COLITIS IN OLDER ADULTS. A SERIES OF CASES.

BACKGROUND: Microscopic colitis (MC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease causing non-bloody diarrhea, and several cases are undiagnosed as a hidden cause of chronic diarrhea. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to report the symptoms, delay diagnosis and the treatment of MC in a case series. METHODS: All patients were treated at a Gastroenterology reference office from May 2022 to June 2023. Personal history including preexisting disorders, use of medications and smoking habits were collected. The delay between the onset of symptoms and the correct diagnosis was informed. All patients consented to use budesonide MMX (Corament®) off label. RESULTS: During the study period, six Caucasoid patients were diagnosed with MC, five females and one male, between the ages of 65 and 74. All patients had comorbities and were taking multiple prescription drugs. Laboratory findings showed negative serology for celiac disease for all patients, normal levels of albumin and vitamin B12. The delay between the symptoms and the MC diagnosis varied from 2 months to 6 years. All patients had a previous diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome. All patients were in complete clinical remission during the treatment and referred no side effects of the drug. CONCLUSION: Older females using high-risk medications are suggestive of MC. Preventing delay in the diagnosis of MC is crucial to improvement in patients´ quality of life. Budesonide MMX appears to be effective, safe and well-tolerated. BACKGROUND: • Microscopic Colitis is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease causing non-bloody diarrhea. BACKGROUND: • Several cases are undiagnosed and can be a hidden cause of chronic diarrhea. BACKGROUND: • Treatment with budesonide MMX (Corament®, off label) was effective and safe.

Diagnosis and Pharmacological Management of Microscopic Colitis in Geriatric Care.

Microscopic colitis, a diagnosis under the umbrella term of inflammatory bowel disease, is a prevalent cause of watery diarrhea, often with symptoms of urgency and bloating, typically observed in older adults aged ≥ 60 years. Its incidence has been reported to exceed those of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in some geographical areas. Although nonpathognomonic endoscopic abnormalities, including changes of the vascular mucosal pattern; mucosal erythema; edema; nodularity; or mucosal defects, e.g., "cat scratches" have been reported, a colonoscopy is typically macroscopically normal. As reliable biomarkers are unavailable, colonoscopy using random biopsies from various parts of the colon is compulsory. Based on the histological examination under a microscope, the disease is divided into collagenous (with a thickened subepithelial collagenous band) and lymphocytic (with intraepithelial lymphocytosis) colitis, although incomplete forms exist. In routine clinical settings, the disease has a high risk of being misdiagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome or even overlooked. Therefore, healthcare providers should be familiar with clinical features and rational management strategies. A 6-8-week oral budesonide treatment course (9 mg/day) is considered the first-line therapy, but patients often experience relapse when discontinued, or might become intolerant, dependent, or even fail to respond. Consequently, other therapeutic options (e.g., bismuth subsalicylate, biologics, loperamide, bile acid sequestrants, and thiopurines) recommended by available guidelines may be prescribed. Herein, clinically meaningful data is provided based on the latest evidence that may aid in reaching a diagnosis and establishing rational therapy in geriatric care to control symptoms and enhance the quality of life for those affected.

The colitis may be microscopic, but the diarrhea is not: update on the treatment of microscopic colitis and immune checkpoint inhibitor colitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Microscopic colitis is an inflammatory disease of the colon that presents as watery diarrhea with minimal to normal endoscopic changes on colonoscopy. It encompasses two common subtypes, lymphocytic colitis and collagenous colitis, which are both treated similarly.Immune checkpoint inhibitor colitis is among the most common immune-related adverse events. Endoscopic and histological findings range from normal colonic mucosa to inflammatory bowel like changes. This review article provides update in treatment and management of microscopic colitis and immune checkpoint inhibitor colitis (ICPi colitis). RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies on microscopic colitis have focused on the successful use of immunomodulators such as biologics for treatment of budesonide refractory microscopic colitis cases. Microscopic colitis does not confer an added risk for colorectal cancer.With the increasing usage of immunotherapy agents, immune checkpoint inhibitor colitis is becoming more common. ICPi colitis can be successfully managed with steroids, with treatment stepped up to biologics for moderate to severe cases or for mild cases that do not respond to steroids. Immunotherapy agents can be carefully re-introduced in mild cases, after treatment of ICPi colitis. SUMMARY: Biologics can be used to treat budesonide refractory microscopic colitis. ICPi colitis can be managed with steroids and biologics in moderate to severe cases.

[Clinical cases of microscopic colitis: Diagnosis and treatment issues. Case report].

Currently, there is an increase in the incidence of microscopic colitis. There are difficulties in diagnosing this disease due to the variability of histological signs, variability of morphological changes in the mucous membrane of the colon in different parts of the colon, and the combination in one patient of not only various forms of microscopic colitis, but also other intestinal diseases. The article describes the differential diagnosis, an example of its staging and successful treatment of various forms of microscopic colitis with budesonide (two clinical cases presented).

What do we know today about drug-induced microscopic colitis? A case of lymphocytic colitis on olmesartan.

Microscopic colitis is part of the differential diagnosis of chronic watery diarrhea. Colonoscopy discloses a normal looking mucosa, therefore its diagnosis is based on histology of colonic biopsies. Two main phenotypes are distinguished: collagenous colitis and lymphocytic colitis. A third entity, incomplete microscopic colitis or unspecified microscopic colitis has been reported in the literature. It affects preferentially women over 60 years of age and its association with certain drugs is increasingly established. In case of suspected drug-induced microscopic colitis, identification of the responsible drug is a key to management. After discontinuation of the suspected drug, the gold standard of treatment is budesonide both for induction and for maintenance in case of clinical relapse, as is often the case after discontinuation. Therapy with immunomodulators, biologics, or surgery is reserved for refractory forms of microscopic colitis after multidisciplinary consultation. Through the clinical case of colitis on olmesartan, we will review the latest recommendations on drug-induced microscopic colitis.

MICROSCOPIC COLITIS: CONSIDERATIONS FOR GASTROENTEROLOGISTS, ENDOSCOPISTS, AND PATHOLOGISTS.

•Diagnosis of microscopic colitis necessitates effective communication among gastroenterologists, endoscopists, and pathologists. •The gastroenterologist should refer every patient with chronic watery diarrhea to perform a colonoscopy in spite of the benign course of the disease and the absence of alarm symptoms. •The endoscopist should take 2 or 3 biopsy samples of the colonic mucosa from the right and left colon, put in separate recipients, despite that the mucosa looked macroscopically normal. •The pathologist should be encouraged to use objective histological criteria to make the diagnosis. Microscopic colitis is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by non-bloody diarrhea that can range from mild to severe. It is difficult to attribute up to 10-20% of chronic diarrhea to microscopic colitis. The three determinants factors of the diagnosis are characteristic clinical symptoms, normal endoscopic picture of the colon, and pathognomonic histological picture. This manuscript aimed to update considerations and recommendations for professionals involved (gastroenterologist, endoscopists and pathologist) in the diagnosis of MC. In addition, a short recommendation about treatment.

Tofacitinib for celiac disease and microscopic colitis: killing two birds with one stone.

Microscopic colitis is a chronic inflammatory condition of the colon. Firstline treatment consists of budesonide, with the consideration of biological agents in refractory cases. Celiac disease is a chronic immune mediated and gluten-induced enteropathy, with treatment consisting of a gluten-free diet. There is an association between microscopic colitis and instead of xand celiac disease, especially in refractory cases they can coincide. In this manuscript, we report for the first time the efficacy of tofacitinib, a pan Janus kinase inhibitor, in the treatment of concomitant microscopic colitis and celiac disease, resulting in persistent clinical and histological remission.

Effectiveness of Non-Budesonide Therapies in Management of Microscopic Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Budesonide is accepted as first-choice therapy for microscopic colitis (MC); however, symptoms often recur and some patients may be dependent, intolerant, or even fail budesonide. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of non-budesonide therapies (thiopurines, bismuth subsalicylate [BSS], bile acid sequestrants [BAS], loperamide and biologics) for MC suggested by international guidelines. METHODS: We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases from their inception to 18 April 2023 for the above-mentioned therapeutics in MC. We pooled the response and remission rates by medication using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies comprising 1475 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Treatment with BSS showed the highest response rate of 75% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.83; I2 = 70.12%), with 50% achieving remission of symptoms (95% CI 0.35-0.65; I2 = 71.06%). Treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (infliximab and adalimumab) demonstrated a response rate of 73% (95% CI 0.63-0.83; I2 = 0.00%), with a remission rate of 44% (95% CI 0.32-0.56; I2 = 0.00%). The response rate for those treated with vedolizumab was similar; 73% responded to treatment (95% CI 0.57-0.87; I2 = 35.93%), with a remission rate of 56% (95% CI 0.36-0.75; I2 = 46.30%). Loperamide was associated with response and remission rates of 62% (95% CI 0.43-0.80; I2 = 92.99%) and 14% (95% CI 0.07-0.25), respectively, whereas BAS use was associated with response and remission rates of 60% (95% CI 0.51-0.68; I2 = 61.65%) and 29% (95% CI 0.12-0.55), respectively. Finally, the outcomes for thiopurine use were 49% (95% CI 0.27-0.71; I2 = 81.45%) and 38% (95% CI 0.23-0.54; I2 = 50.05%), respectively DISCUSSION: The present systematic review and meta-analysis provides rates of effectiveness of non-budesonide therapies for MC based on available data in the field. Studies in the meta-analysis showed a large amount of heterogeneity due to the variability in assessing the clinical effects of intervention between the studies caused by differences in the definitions of response or remission rates between the studies included. This may likely result in overestimating the benefit of a treatment. Furthermore, the number of participants and drug dosages varied, and only a few studies applied disease-specific activity indices. Only one randomized controlled trial (RCT) was identified. All other 24 included studies were either case series or (retrospective) cohort studies, which complicated efforts to perform further sensitivity analyses to adjust for potential confounders and risk of bias. In addition, the overall evidence on the effect of these treatment options was judged as low, mostly due to comparability bias and the observational nature of the available studies, which limited statistically robust comparisons of rates of effectiveness of the different non-budesonide agents ranked against each other. However, our observational findings may inform clinicians regarding the most rational selection of non-budesonide therapies to patients with MC. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: PROSPERO protocol #CRD42020218649.

Bile Acid Sequestrants in Microscopic Colitis: Clinical Outcomes and Utility of Bile Acid Testing.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Bile acid sequestrants (BAS) may be a treatment in microscopic colitis (MC), but efficacy data are limited. We evaluated the effectiveness of BAS in MC and assessed the utility of bile acid testing to predict response. METHODS: Adults with MC treated with BAS (2010-2020) at Mayo Clinic were identified. Bile acid malabsorption was defined by elevated serum 7⍺-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one or by fecal testing using previously validated cutoffs. Response was defined at 12 ± 4 weeks after BAS initiation as: complete (resolution of diarrhea), partial (≥50% improvement in diarrhea), nonresponse (<50% improvement), and intolerance (discontinuation due to side effects). Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of response to BAS. RESULTS: We identified 282 patients (median age, 59 years [range, 20-87 years]; 88.3% women) with median follow-up of 4.5 years (range, 0.4-9.1 years). Patients were treated with the following BAS: 64.9% cholestyramine, 21.6% colesevelam, and 13.5% colestipol. Clinical outcomes were: 49.3% complete response, 16.3% partial response, 24.8% nonresponse, and 9.6% intolerance. There were no differences in outcomes between those on BAS alone or BAS combined with other medications (P = .98). The dose of BAS was not associated with response (P = .51). Bile acid testing was done in 31.9% of patients, and 56.7% were positive. No predictors of response to BAS were identified. After BAS discontinuation, 41.6% had recurrence at a median of 21 weeks (range, 1-172 weeks). CONCLUSION: In one of the largest cohorts evaluating BAS treatment in MC, nearly two-thirds had a partial or complete response. Additional research is needed to determine the role of BAS and bile acid malabsorption in MC.

Meta-analysis: Placebo rates in microscopic colitis randomised trials and applications for future drug development using a historical control arm.

BACKGROUND: Effective medical therapies for patients with microscopic colitis (MC) who fail budesonide are lacking. However, conducting randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in MC has been challenging due to small sample sizes. Understanding placebo responses can help inform more efficient future trials. AIMS: The aim of this study is to estimate clinical and histologic placebo response rates and to determine factors associated with placebo response in MC. METHODS: EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL were searched until 7 January 2022, to identify placebo-controlled RCTs in adult patients with MC. Clinical and histologic response in the placebo arms were pooled using random-effects models. Stratified analyses based on disease- and trial-level characteristics, leave-one-out meta-analysis, and cumulative meta-analysis were performed. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs enrolling a total of 391 patients (placebo n = 163) with MC were included. Pooled clinical and histologic placebo response rates were 24.4% (95% CI: 12.4%-38.4%), I2  = 60.8%, p < 0.01, and 19.9% (95% CI: 5.3%-39.0%), I2  = 66.4%, p = 0.01 (tests for heterogeneity), respectively. Clinical response to placebo was numerically higher in patients with lymphocytic compared to collagenous colitis (39.9% vs. 19.8%, p = 0.08). Heterogeneity in clinical response to placebo was significantly reduced when the Miehlke 2014 RCT was excluded in the leave-one-out meta-analysis or when a more stringent secondary definition of response based on the Hjortswang criteria was applied. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-quarter of patients in MC trials respond to placebo, although with substantial heterogeneity, reflecting the need for standardised outcome definitions and study designs for MC. This analysis also serves to inform future MC trials that may consider incorporating an external, historical placebo control arm, rather than directly randomising patients to placebo.

Autoimmune and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases after exposure to acid-suppressive medication: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacovigilance risk signals have proposed a relationship between the use of acid-suppressive medications and the development of certain autoimmune and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. OBJECTIVE: A systematic review and a meta-analysis was performed. METHODS: We reviewed MEDLINE (Ovid) and Scopus for comparative observational studies between these diseases and previous exposure to proton-pump inhibitors (PPI), H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA), and antacids. The protocol was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42020192715). RESULTS: From 3,191 citations, 25 articles were eligible and covered 16 diseases. Microscopic colitis (MC) was studied the most (7 studies). In a random-effects meta-analysis, there was low certainty evidence (GRADE approach) of a non-significant relationship between exposure to any PPIs and MC (meta-OR 3.28, 95% CI 0.98-11.0, I2 98.2%, six studies, 4,436 PPI-exposed MC patients). Moderate certainty evidence pointed towards large odds of collagenous colitis after exposure to lansoprazole (meta-OR 14.5, 95% CI 9.37-22.3, I2 10.2%, three studies, 1,725 lansoprazole-exposed patients). After PPI exposure, the risk of rheumatoid arthritis was slightly increased based on low certainty evidence from two cohort studies totaling 475 diagnoses (meta-RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.12-2.34, I2 34.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MC, it would be reasonable to carefully review the indication of PPI, especially in CC patients using lansoprazole.

Characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients with pre-existing microscopic colitis after exposure to PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors.

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are frequently associated with adverse events, often affecting the gastrointestinal tract. We conducted this study to determine the characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients with pre-existing microscopic colitis (MC) who underwent ICI treatment. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we identified 10 patients with pre-existing MC who received ICIs at our center 01/2010-06/2020. Clinical characteristics and disease outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Of 124 screened patients with MC before ICI exposure, 10 had sufficient data to be included in the study. Melanoma (40%) and lung cancer (30%) were the most prevalent cancer types, with 70% of stage IV cancer. Patients received either anti-programmed death 1 regimen (8, 80%) or anti-programmed death ligand 1 agent (2, 20%). Six patients (60%) had collagenous colitis, and 4 (40%) had lymphocytic colitis. The median time from MC diagnosis to ICI initiation was 4 years, with 1 patient on budesonide within 2 months of ICI initiation. Eight patients (80%) developed colitis exacerbations after ICI  and required selective immunosuppression. One patient received a compassionate-use fecal transplantation. The median time from ICI to colitis exacerbation was 14 days, with 40% and 50% of patients experiencing grade 3 diarrhea and grade 2 colitis, respectively, leading to hospitalization in 3 patients. Six patients received steroids and vedolizumab with no colitis recurrence. Of 8 patients who had colitis exacerbation, 6 resumed ICI therapy afterward; with 5 receiving concomitant vedolizumab for secondary prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that ICI exposure increases the risk of exacerbation of underlying colitis necessitating and responding to potent immunosuppression therapy.

Microscopic colitis, a forgotten condition: a clinical case and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: Microscopic colitis is a not uncommon chronic inflammatory disease of the colon, characterized by watery, non-bloody diarrhea, which is often forgotten and misdiagnosed. CASE PRESENTATION: In this paper, we present a puzzling case of relapsing chronic diarrhea triggered by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) abuse, smoking, inappropriate antibiotic use, and secondary Clostridium Difficilis infection. Several tests were performed during hospitalization, all of which were negative apart from fecal calprotectin (> 6,000 mg/kg, normal values < 50 mg/kg) and a positive Clostridium Difficilis toxin test. Since Vancomycin treatment did not bring about the expected response, colonoscopy was performed, which led to diagnosis, targeted therapy, and clinical resolution. Targeted therapy with budesonide and probiotics was initiated leading to resolution of the diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: This case study shows how actual diagnosis may be delayed not only due to having to perform differential diagnosis with chronic inflammatory diseases, but also because certainty can only come from histological evidence, which takes time to obtain, especially when the disease's multifactorial nature is considered (smoking, NSAID abuse, oral proton pump inhibitors, inappropriate antibiotic use, and Clostridium difficilis infection).

Efficacy and safety of biologic therapy in microscopic colitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of biologic therapy in the treatment of steroid-refractory microscopic colitis (MC). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central to identify articles and abstracts reporting efficacy or safety data on biologic use (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and tofacitinib) for induction and maintenance of remission in MC. We assessed clinical remission and response rates and all reported adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 376 studies were screened yielding 13 articles (including four abstracts) with a combined information on 78 patients for efficacy and safety outcomes. Most studies were case series. Vedolizumab was used in five studies, adalimumab in three, and a combination of infliximab and adalimumab in five studies. The rates of remission were 66.08% (95% CI, 36.79-95.37%; I2 , 71%) at weeks 3-6 and 54.20% (95% CI, 39.39-69.01%; I2 , 0%) at weeks 12-16. Clinical response rates were 100% (95% CI, 88.04-100%; I2 , 0%) at weeks 3-6 and 67.20% (95% CI, 47.72-86.69%; I2 , 52%) at weeks 12-16. Most frequent AE was medication discontinuation with a pooled incidence of 16.1% (95% CI, 5.9-37.5%). No deaths attributable to biologic use were reported. The overall quality of evidence was very low due to the high risk of biases. CONCLUSION: Low-quality evidence supports the short-term efficacy of biologics in budesonide refractory MC. While our findings represent the most comprehensive evaluation of biologic therapy in severe MC, further research including randomized clinical trials is needed to better define the role of specific agents and long-term therapy.

Biologic Therapy for Budesonide-refractory, -dependent or -intolerant Microscopic Colitis: a Multicentre Cohort Study from the GETAID.

BACKGROUND: Budesonide remains the backbone therapy for microscopic colitis [MC]; however, relapses are frequent, and some patients are intolerant or dependent. Anti-TNF therapy is increasingly used to treat these patients, but available evidence is still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anti-TNF therapy in MC patients failing budesonide. METHODS: In a multicentre retrospective cohort study, budesonide-refractory, -dependent, or -intolerant MC patients treated with anti-TNF agents were included. Clinical remission was defined as fewer than three bowel movements per day, and clinical response was defined as an improvement in stool frequency of at least 50%. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included. Median age was 58.5 years, median disease duration was 25 months, and median follow-up was 29.5 months. Seven patients were treated with infliximab [IFX], and seven with adalimumab. Clinical remission without steroids at 12 weeks was reached in 5/14 [35.7%] patients; all of these received IFX. Clinical response at 12 and 52 weeks, was obtained in 9/14 [64.3%] and 7/14 [50%] patients, respectively. Five patients switched to another anti-TNF agent. When considering both first- and second-line anti-TNF therapies, 7 [50%] patients were in clinical remission at Week 52. Mild to moderate adverse events were reported in six ptients. Two patients were treated with vedolizumab, of whom one had clinical response; one patient treated with ustekinumab had no response. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first multicentre cohort study showing that half of patients treated with anti-TNF therapy for MC achieved clinical remission in case of budesonide failure.

Secukinumab-Induced Lymphocytic Colitis.

Secukinumab an interleukin-17 (IL-17) monoclonal antibody inhibitor is currently approved for the treatment of rheumatological conditions, such as psoriasis and ankylosing spondylitis. Lymphocytic colitis, a phenotype of microscopic colitis, is a long-term inflammatory condition, is characterized by relapsing diarrhea. The specific entity of drug-induced lymphocytic colitis has been discussed with numerous individual cases being reported from around the world. Secukinumab has been linked with exacerbation of and de novo cases of inflammatory bowel disease. However, lymphocytic colitis in association with this drug has not been documented. The management of drug-induced lymphocytic colitis is complicated, as patients frequently exhibit spontaneous remission of symptoms. Removal of the offending agent has shown some benefit; however, some patients continue to exhibit symptoms months after drug cessation and washout. Although our patient's lymphocytic colitis was benign and responded to the cessation Secukinumab, it is an important diagnosis to consider in patients with new onset relapsing diarrhea treated with biologics.

Budesonide Maintenance in Microscopic Colitis: Clinical Outcomes and Safety Profile From a Population-Based Study.

INTRODUCTION: Outcomes and safety of budesonide maintenance therapy in microscopic colitis (MC) are not well known. METHODS: Adult residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, diagnosed with MC (2002-2019) and treated with budesonide were identified using the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Response was assessed at 12 ± 4 weeks after initiation of therapy and defined as complete (resolution of diarrhea), partial (≥50% improvement in the number of bowel movements), nonresponse (<50% improvement), and intolerance (discontinued because of side effects). For safety outcomes, cases (budesonide maintenance) and MC controls (no budesonide therapy) were matched by sex and age at diagnosis (±2 years). RESULTS: A total of 450 patients were identified, of whom 162 (36.0%) were treated with budesonide for induction of clinical remission (median age 67 [23-91] years and 126 women [77.8%] ). Clinical outcomes for induction were as follows: 130 (80.2%) complete response, 22 (13.6%) partial response, 8 (4.9%) no response, and 2 (1.2%) intolerance. After induction, 96 (63.2%) had recurrence after discontinuation, of whom 27 (28.1%) required further budesonide induction treatment without maintenance, 56 (58.3%) required long-term budesonide maintenance, and 13 (13.5%) were treated with other therapies. Of those receiving budesonide maintenance, all responded (55 [98.2%] complete and 1 [1.8%] partial). No patient stopped maintenance from adverse events. The median duration of follow-up was 5.6 years (0.3-18.9). There was no significant difference between cases and controls in the incidence of osteopenia/osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, glaucoma, or cataracts. DISCUSSION: The long-term use of budesonide in MC seems to be effective and generally well tolerated with limited adverse effects.

Fecal calprotectin - a valuable predictor of microscopic colitis.

OBJECTIVE: Microscopic colitis (MC) has been of major concern worldwide due to its relapsing and remitting nature of chronic diarrhea. Quality of life of patients suffering from this disease is quite debilitating. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In order to understand the role and importance of fecal calprotectin (FC) we performed a statistical analysis on the patients suffering from chronic diarrhea and admitted to our hospital from 2014 to 2020, and who were prescribed Loperamide (Imodium) or Budesonide or a combination of both and had undergone FC detection test. RESULTS: FC was found to be significantly correlated to the age, alcohol consumption and beta blocker use. A high level of the FC concentrations increases the chances of having flare-ups of diarrhea episodes making the quality of life of such patients worse. CONCLUSIONS: FC concentrations should be monitored frequently and precautionary measures to avoid a relapse should be aimed. Measures to improve quality of life, should be of prime concern. In-depth research is required to better understand MC and to find better treatment options which can be used on a long-term basis, instead of anti-motility drugs which are able to control the acute episodes, but when discontinued result in an increased tendency to have relapses.

Bile Acid Sequestrant Therapy in Microscopic Colitis.

GOALS: There is an unmet need in investigating corticosteroid-sparing treatments for induction and maintenance of remission in microscopic colitis (MC). The authors' aim was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with MC treated with bile acid sequestrants (BAS). BACKGROUND: MC is a common chronic diarrheal illness. Budesonide is effective induction therapy, but relapses are high after cessation of treatment. STUDY: Our cohort consisted of patients enrolled in our institutional MC registry, a biorepository of histology-confirmed diagnoses of MC. Patients receiving BAS for the treatment of MC were reviewed at each clinical visit for efficacy or ability to decrease budesonide maintenance dosing. RESULTS: The authors included 79 patients (29 collagenous colitis and 50 lymphocytic colitis) with a median follow-up period of 35 months (range, 1 to 120). Most patients were female individuals (78%) and the median age was 69 years (range, 29 to 87). BAS therapy was used in 21 patients who were budesonide-naive, with a response rate of 76% (16/21). In patients treated previously with budesonide, 46 patients were budesonide-dependent and given BAS as maintenance therapy. Of these patients, 23 (50%) were able to decrease their budesonide dosing and 9 (20%) were able to stop budesonide completely. Seven of 46 patients (15%) stopped BAS because of intolerance, perceived lack of benefit, or treatment of concomitant diarrhea illness. CONCLUSIONS: BAS may be an effective corticosteroid-sparing option in the treatment of MC and should be considered after budesonide induction. Larger controlled studies are needed to confirm the efficacy for long-term maintenance and tolerability of BAS in patients with MC.